From Kleptopedia

Countless deconstructions of the cunning, pervasive, often brutal plutocracy are proliferated by clear-eyed, outlier individuals all around the world. These speakers of truth to power (whatever their particular angle) may not be highly visible in the mainstream media but, thanks to the internet, social media, podcasting, and global content platforms (like Youtube, Twitch, IP2, and Patreon) the independent counter-narrative landscape has a bigger reach than at any time in history.

Think how much more difficult it must have been before podcasts, cellphones, and social media to publish revelations, or for simpatico groups to get informed, to organize, and to instantly share content across diffuse intranetworks, to everyone subscribing an interest. The sum of these independents, contrarian or conventional, pulses information to and from every point on the planet. The resource is unparalleled. Information control is damage limitation, for nations and institutions, as a best-case scenario.

It may be surprising, then, to perceive how little impact the past two decades' transformative technology has had on holding entrenched power and wealth to account. It may shock to consider how, if anything, the front-line of authoritarian excess, state-sponsored kleptocratic grift and opportunity versus oppressive policy has grown more brazen and less accountable since the turn of the millennium. Not even the Financial Crisis of 2007/2008 affected this trend.

Plutocracies certainly use technologies old and new to organize against disruptive influences, to obscure their activities (where possible) and keep a constant hypernormalized reality publicized to the broader population. The public must remain confused, polarized, and misdirected. Democratic legitimacy is turned from a potential surrender of authority (by a ruling elite) into a practical solution to the risky power dynamics of few rulers versus innumerable ruled.

Institutional power hasn't grown more powerful, however, simply by getting better at hiding truth. This isn't possible in an information age playing out in cyberspace that makes global activity local. Nor have the forces of authority grown necessarily more violent in its oppression of the population or its pursuit and elimination of outliers. In fact, quite the opposite. Democracy is not ubiquitous, in the world, but it's the dominant social contract - freedom exists, for more humans than ever before - and the lightning is kept in the bottle by almost entirely peaceful citizen policing. To a greater degree, independent or contrarian media voices loudly and publicly expose the crimes of corrupt politicians, release damning evidence of corporate exploitation, document the enriching of oligarchs, detail the oppression of marginalized minorities for the sake of profit; reaching a significant audience. None of it significantly shifts the needle of public inertia.

There's certainly a multi-layered, ever-evolving, responsive army of protections for continuity of extant power and wealth dynamics but at its root, there's a simple intractable reality to the activity of the plutocracy and the passivity of the population: lineage land rights.

Exposing an amoral, avaricious, often criminal underbelly to the idealized facade of institutional orthodoxy never addresses this deeper dichotomy. We live in a world of landlords and tenants, writ large across over 200 countries and almost 8 billion human beings.

Reveal the latest hypocrisy? It becomes a directionless shock-porn. It neutralizes rather than inspires any coherent movement for change. Most importantly, the worst exploitation becomes shock-porn not because of the subject matter - injustice, criminal negligence, inhuman abuses of power, they are what they are - but because of the atomized predisposition of the general public itself.

The real battle-lines separating the powerful inheritors of lineage wealth and entrenched power (the landlords) from the exploited, disenfranchised population (the tenants) is a contest of sociopath ambition against apathy. It's 1% of one percent well-motivated, driven to action, carrying the other 99% of the one percent and supported by a small army of status quo vassal satellites, against the vast human herd of short-sighted, conventional proletariat living a 'best life' of self-serving path of least resistance.

Counter-culture's failure isn't its ability to see the brutal reality of plutocracy. Its failure is an inability to rouse the public, despite all the truth and facts, from the comfortable somnambulism of day-to-day self-interest.

Let’s call a spade a spade. No matter how much of a maelstrom society may look, from year to year, through the lens of colorized history and contemporary media, the robust neo-feudal dynamic of landlord and tenant hasn’t been genuinely threatened in literally hundreds of years.


“The robots came bearing a gift and the name of it was 'Plenty.' Plenty is a habit-forming drug. You do not cut the dosage down. You kick it if you can; you stop the dose entirely. But the convulsions that follow may wreck the body entirely.”

Some argue that plutocracy with a semi-porous meritocratic perimeter - allowing exceptional individuals in and cutting out the deadwood of the most degraded - is the best pragmatic long-term natural order for the world. Let the winners excel and be rewarded; and for the losers? Que sera sera. Maybe if we were all living an ideal life, patient meritocracy could one day resolve the inequities of the 21st-century landlord-tenant dynamic, but, like the 20th-century's misplaced faith in communism, collective or corporate ownership of a nation's resources simply gives a focus for ambitious authoritarians, ultimately at the expense of public freedom. Both systems lead to an entrenched ruling elite ringfencing opportunity, while nations become structured to shepherd vast populations of sheep from cradle to crave. Fundamentally, these systems squander human potential at an unprecedented scale and the vast majority of individuals are born into some form of poverty. As a species, we can't afford to be so short-sighted and profligate. As a humane civilization, we shouldn't allow this dynamic to continue.


Consider. We are medium-sized, ephemeral primates, stranded on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam; sharing the planet with a panoply of formidable virus and bacteria and the rest of nature's diversity, in an observable universe of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars. We could be wiped out by an asteroid strike tomorrow. As it is, as a species, we are barely inching forward. Presently only a tiny fraction of us are equipped to contribute and, what's worse, the rest are disenfranchised, trained by fear and ignorance to resist any movement at all. It makes no sense to be excluding over seven billion brains from their human potential. It's an incomprehensible waste. Can you imagine the progress that'd be possible, if every human being was free to fulfill that potential? It might even generate enough velocity to escape extinction.

"Responsibility... accrues through privilege. People like you and me have an unbelievable amount of privilege and therefore we have a huge amount of responsibility. We live in free societies where we are not afraid of the police; we have extraordinary wealth available to us by global standards. If you have those things, then you have the kind of responsibility that a person does not have if he or she is slaving seventy hours a week to put food on the table; a responsibility at the very least to inform yourself about power." - Noam Chomsky


When all's said and done, most of the hot button topics of the public conversation are the obsessive compulsive gossip of cultural and economic zeitgeist. Whatever. but some things aren't. Some things are for real.

Climate? Tech? Bio? AI?